September 18-19
PNA Foundation Training Room
Harrisburg, PA
Video Journalism (multi-day, hands-on workshop)
Instructor: Robb Montgomery
GOAL: Journalists will learn the fundamentals of producing compelling Web video journalism.
Reporters will learn how to set up their cameras and audio gear to produce professional reports from the field; How to shoot and edit sequences, conduct interviews for film and practice with the editing workflow, story editing and principal technologies.
Working in small groups and using their cameras and editing tools, students will get hands-on experience gathering the elements to put together a news video for the Web.
We cover the following in a multi-day seminar.
SHOOTING
The fundamentals of visual reporting and filmmaking
Basic shots and sequences
Students shoot b-roll (wide, medium, tight) and cutaways .
Interviews - How to prepare, shoot and edit.
Audio: Nat sound, music, SOTs and voice over narration
EDITING
Story pacing, building sequences, sound editing, transitions, lower-thirds graphics and keys to propelling a film in the longer form.
Students put the visual story together first - using b-roll only
Review and check for understanding at each step
Editing sound elements, producing voice over narration, how to write scripts and deliver pieces to camera
How to put these elements together - editing and producing a video story
Lab time and personal coaching, techniques for publishing video online
Show me don’t tell me.
Here are some more graphics that dramatically show where the steep cuts and sudden changes in U.S. newspaper are being made to the product.
These are just a few of the illustrations presented in the new Pew Excellence in Journalism report.
Journalist Tyler Marshall conducted face-to-face interviews with editors and other newsroom executives at 15 daily newspapers across the United States between early November, 2007 and mid-January, 2008. In addition a 43-question survey was administered by Princeton Survey Research Associates International (PSRAI) and sent to the editors of 1217 daily newspapers. The survey garnered 259 replies.
I found these the most compelling grafs from the report . . .
Overall, newsroom executives say they feel broadly unprepared for the changes sweeping over them and seem uncertain where the changes would lead.
The bottom line culturally is this: In today’s newspapers, stories tend to be gathered faster and under greater pressure by a smaller, less experienced staff of reporters, then are passed more quickly through fewer, less experienced, editing hands on their way to publication.
The majority of newspapers are now suffering cutbacks in staffing, and even more in the amount of news, or newshole, they offer the public. The forces buffeting the industry continue to affect larger metro newspapers to a far greater extent than smaller ones. In some cases, these differences are so stark it seems that larger and smaller newspapers are living two distinctly different experiences. Fully 85% of the dailies surveyed with circulations over 100,000 have cut newsroom staff in the last three years, while only 52% of smaller papers reported cuts. Recent announcements of a further round of newsroom staff reductions at large papers, including the Los Angeles Times, the Chicago Tribune and the Washington Post, indicates these differences may be widening further. Our survey found that more than half of the editors at larger papers and a third at smaller ones expect more cutbacks in the next year. But a weaker-than-expected economic performance during the first half of 2008 and grimmer forecasts for the rest of the year suggest some of those cutbacks have already been implemented and darken these projections even further.
Papers both large and small have reduced the space, resources and commitment devoted to a range of topics. At the top of that list, nearly two thirds of papers surveyed have cut back on foreign news, over half have trimmed national news and more than a third have reduced business coverage. In effect, America’s newspapers are narrowing their reach and their ambitions and becoming niche reads.
The culture of the daily newspaper newsroom is also changing. New job demands are drawing a generation of young, versatile, tech-savvy, high-energy staff as financial pressures drive out higher-salaried veteran reporters and editors. Newsroom executives say the infusion of new blood has brought with it a new competitive energy, but they also cite the departure of veteran journalists, along with the talent, wisdom and institutional memory they hold as their single greatest loss. Clearly stretched to describe what is unfolding in their newsrooms, editors use words like, “exciting,” “extraordinary,” “nerve-wracking” and “tumultuous.”
Newspaper websites are increasingly a source of hope but also of fear. Editors feel torn between the advantages the web offers and the energy it consumes to produce material often of limited or even questionable value. A plurality of editors (48%), for instance, say they are conflicted by the trade-offs between the speed, depth and interactivity of the web and what those benefits are costing in terms of accuracy and journalistic standards. Yet a similar plurality (43%) thinks “web technology offers the potential for greater-than-ever journalism and will be the savior of what we once thought of as newspaper newsrooms.”
If reporters are laid off and the paper doesn’t report their actions - did it really happen? It is, perhaps, an unforgivable journalism sin that this story is not being told fully by some closely-watched U.S. newspapers. Reports from The New York Times and Editor And Publisher indicate that editors-in-chief of Tribune newspapers in Florida are neither announcing nor publishing the newsroom layoffs they are making at this very moment.
From the E&P item: “Of concern to several staffers, however, has been the Sun-Sentinel’s lack of reporting on the cutbacks, with no stories appearing in the newspaper or on its Web site about the cuts. In most cases, newspapers have reported on their own cutbacks prior to the final reductions.”
The Indy has a great sit down with the maverick editor of the The Sunday Times who wrote the book on newspaper design 35 ears ago - Sir Harold Evans.
An excerpt: Harold Evans: ‘These grand designs must have stories to back them up’
“Here’s a thing about innovation,” says Evans sagely. “Nobody has ever predicted the next innovation.” In one respect though he did clearly lay claim to having seen the future: that design would have to take the lead. “Newspaper design cannot go on being so insular if the newspaper is to fulfil its role,” he wrote in Editing and Design.
Evans was editor of The Sunday Times from 1967 to 1981 and first published his five-volume tome Editing and Design in 1973. He was knighted for services to journalism in 2004.
In the interview he talks powerfully about the impact and value of visual journalism.
He also critiques The New York Times design at length and finds it greatly lacking, adding “The New York Times desperately needs to rethink its whole design.”
Robb Montgomery is the CEO of Visual Editors and an independent consultant.
He has worked as a visual editor for the Chicago Sun-Times and the Chicago Tribune and partners with media groups and journalism associations in more than 16 countries to design training curriculum for video journalism, newspaper design and multimedia reporting.
Latest Comments
RSS