<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Early birds to the multimedia training in Pennsylvania</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robbmontgomery.com/2008/06/early-birds-to-the-multimedia-training-in-pennsylvania/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robbmontgomery.com/2008/06/early-birds-to-the-multimedia-training-in-pennsylvania/</link>
	<description>Newspaper design, visual journalism, and documentary video</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robb Montgomery</title>
		<link>http://www.robbmontgomery.com/2008/06/early-birds-to-the-multimedia-training-in-pennsylvania/#comment-25667</link>
		<dc:creator>Robb Montgomery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 03:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robbmontgomery.com/home/2008/newspaper/design/06/early-birds-to-the-multimedia-training-in-pennsylvania/#comment-25667</guid>
		<description>I also read that story yesterday, it was linked to in my daily reading list. 

Yep, there are precautions and common sense steps for journalists and publishers to take. For example - there is no practical Web need to upload images larger than 500 pixels wide. That precaution speeds up your uploads and also ensures that copies of these lo-res files will produce unsatisfactory enlargements.

The other thing to do for a publisher account is to use the privacy settings to take the photos out of public and search engine view. You can do that on Flickr and still produce the richly annotated slideshows I taught you how to create.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also read that story yesterday, it was linked to in my daily reading list. </p>
<p>Yep, there are precautions and common sense steps for journalists and publishers to take. For example - there is no practical Web need to upload images larger than 500 pixels wide. That precaution speeds up your uploads and also ensures that copies of these lo-res files will produce unsatisfactory enlargements.</p>
<p>The other thing to do for a publisher account is to use the privacy settings to take the photos out of public and search engine view. You can do that on Flickr and still produce the richly annotated slideshows I taught you how to create.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbara Phillips Long</title>
		<link>http://www.robbmontgomery.com/2008/06/early-birds-to-the-multimedia-training-in-pennsylvania/#comment-25666</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbara Phillips Long</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 03:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robbmontgomery.com/home/2008/newspaper/design/06/early-birds-to-the-multimedia-training-in-pennsylvania/#comment-25666</guid>
		<description>At the multimedia workshop, you had us sign up for Flickr. So I thought you might be interested in this story by a friend of mine, Wendy Grossman, who wrote about people taking other people's photos from Flickr and selling them as their own:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2008/jun/18/news.internet

Unfortunately, there's no reliable marking for photos. How does the media (or, for that matter, any photographer) profit from traffic on the web when others divert that traffic?

I understand the desire to link and quote and do mashups and other manipulation of media. But I am also concerned about intellectual property rights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the multimedia workshop, you had us sign up for Flickr. So I thought you might be interested in this story by a friend of mine, Wendy Grossman, who wrote about people taking other people&#8217;s photos from Flickr and selling them as their own:<br />
<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2008/jun/18/news.internet" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2008/jun/18/news.internet</a></p>
<p>Unfortunately, there&#8217;s no reliable marking for photos. How does the media (or, for that matter, any photographer) profit from traffic on the web when others divert that traffic?</p>
<p>I understand the desire to link and quote and do mashups and other manipulation of media. But I am also concerned about intellectual property rights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
